Log In | Register
Skip to main content
Topic: Michelin LTX vs. Crossclimate  (Read 272 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Michelin LTX vs. Crossclimate
We're ready to replace the tires on our 2017 MB. The current tires are Michelin LTX, and several people have mentioned the CrossClimate. Any significant differences to be aware of?

Thanks,

George & Jo Ann
2017 MB
George & Jo Ann
2017 MB
Re: Michelin LTX vs. Crossclimate
Reply #1 –
Both are good choices.   I have crossclimates on my RV and Defender LTXs on 2 other vehicles I own.

Crossclimates have slightly better performance across wet and cold conditions.   The Defender LTXs will probably last longer (miles).

I went with CrossClimates on my RV because I'm not likely to drive enough miles to benefit from the longevity.  The RV tires will time out before they wear out. 

If you want the technical details, watch this.  Most people will probably be very happy with either choice.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5V7sK-WfR0&ab_channel=MichelinUSA

There are 2 different versions of the crossclimate - regular and C-metric.  

Rich
2003 MB
Re: Michelin LTX vs. Crossclimate
Reply #2 –
Rich is correct, the Crossclimate is optimized for bad weather performance at the expense of tread life and rolling resistance (fuel economy).

Since I want the best performance possible if I get caught in bad weather, the crossclimate makes sense to me.   LTX make more sense on your car, where you have more of an option to stay home when weather gets nasty.

I wore out my first set of crossclimates in 40,000 miles over 2.5 years.   Could I have gotten another 5,000 miles or more out of them?  Probably, but I was near a tire shop I trusted with fresh new crossclimates, heading into winter weather in the Rockies, decided it was a good time to replace.

I expect this next set to age out.
Dave

2017 TK
Re: Michelin LTX vs. Crossclimate
Reply #3 –
Dave,

I would absolutely love to put that many miles on our LD in such a short amount of time. We barely get an average of 3500 miles a year. Our Crossclimates probably have 3000 since new 1 1/2 years ago.

Good on ya mate.

Kent
2015 27' RB "MissB.Haven"
Re: Michelin LTX vs. Crossclimate
Reply #4 –
Here is another point of view. The Crosclimates are a good tire but cannot be rotated conventionally, especially when equipped with stem extenders, since the tire is designed to rotate in only one direction. They cannot be run backwards.

Rotation is important to get even wear, and it's even more important to rotate the rear inner tire on the passenger side. It is exposed to high heat from the exhaust pipe that runs very close to the tire. The rear inner passenger tire is the one that most commonly blows out from heat, unless rotated periodically to spread the heat damage over several tires.
We suffered from a rear inner tire blowout and the resulting damage to the coach. I had not rotated the rear tires befores since theyn wore evenly, I now rotate the tires every 5,000-7,000 miles, along with installing heat shields on the exhaust where it is close to the tire to limit heat exposure.
Blown rear tire damage | Flickr
Exhaust heat shields | Flickr

Having run Michelin LTXs, and their variations over the last 30 years and 220,000 miles, all I have to say is that they are great tires in all weather conditions. You name it, we've driven in it.

Larry
Larry
2003 23.5' Front Lounge, since new.  Previously 1983 22' Front Lounge.
Tow vehicles  2020 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon, 2001 Jeep Cherokee
Photo Collection: Lazy Daze
Re: Michelin LTX vs. Crossclimate
Reply #5 –
Quote from: rich  - 
I second Larry's recommendation for a heat shield.  I fabricated one with a scrap piece of aluminum and a couple of muffler clamps.   No one wants a blown tire!  

Agreed! Do you have a photo of the heat shield you fabricated, Rich?
Greg & Victoria
2017 Mid-Bath  “Nocona” towing a manual 2015 Forester
Previously a 1985 TK
SKP #61264
Re: Michelin LTX vs. Crossclimate
Reply #6 –
Quote from: HiLola  - 
Agreed! Do you have a photo of the heat shield you fabricated, Rich?

It's basically the same as what Larry posted above.  Only difference is I used muffler clamps to attach (I don't recall what size).

Amazon.com: Walker 35336 2 1/4 Inch Heavy Duty Clamp : Automotive

I deleted my last message b/c I had some info about inflation tables that might not be true anymore.  

Here is a great brochure explaining the difference between the 2 tire choices:

https://www.michelinb2b.com/wps/b2bcontent/PDF/Agilis_CrossClimate_Flyer_E.pdf

I think most owners would be very satisfied with either choice.

Rich

As an Amazon Associate Lazy Daze Owners' Group earns from qualifying purchases.
2003 MB
Re: Michelin LTX vs. Crossclimate
Reply #8 –
Quote from: Kent Heckethorn  - 
,
I would absolutely love to put that many miles on our LD in such a short amount of time. We barely get an average of 3500 miles a year. Our Crossclimates probably have 3000 since new 1 1/2 years ago.
Alaska & Newfoundland account for majority of the miles, both one and done if I want to stay married.

2-3 months a year are her limit
Dave

2017 TK
 
Re: Michelin LTX vs. Crossclimate
Reply #9 –
Looking at the Michelin fitment chart, the only tire available in 225/75/R16 size is the Crossclimate in either LT or C-metric. The LTX is available only in larger sizes??

George & Jo Ann
George & Jo Ann
2017 MB